Helen T. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (11th Cir. May 18, 2023) - treatment regimen (excessive absences), RFC - voluntary remand ‘[n]on-examining physicians’ opinions are entitled

‘[n]on-examining physicians’ opinions are entitled to little weight when they contradict opinions of examining physicians and do not alone constitute substantial evidence

noting “the Fourth Circuit has long held that ‘while there must be objective medical evidence of some condition that could reasonably produce the pain

4)  Reversal with instructions for payment of benefits is an appropriate remedy

Turner’s opinions

Helen T. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (11th Cir. May 18, 2023) - treatment regimen (excessive absences), RFC - voluntary remand ‘[n]on-examining physicians’ opinions are entitledHelen T. v. Commr of Soc. Sec., Case No. 22 13874 (11th Cir. May 18, 2023) (Before Jordan, Newsom, and Lagoa, Circuit Judges) Briefs Included: Appellants Initial Brief, Appellees Unopposed Motion for Remand and Remand Order Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC sustained work activities RFC absenteeism Subjective symptoms treatment regimen Rulings addressed: Social Security Ruling 83 10 Social Security Ruling 96 8p Issues briefed: 1)